Reviewer Guidelines

The journal works hard to promote scientific knowledge, and a strong peer review procedure is very necessary for a research paper to be published with legitimacy. An essential step in the publication process is manuscript review. Reviewers are requested to assess the manuscript's scientific quality and give suggestions to make sure it meets our requirements. Reviewers are asked to offer honest, constructive criticism and review remarks for each paper. Within the time period specified, a reviewer must evaluate the articles they have received from the editing office or the editor.

1. Reviewers must adhere to the review requirements and evaluate the papers in light of the originality, uniqueness, and lack of plagiarism.
2. Reviewers need to be aware that the peer review process is confidential and that any information obtained from it shouldn't be utilised for personal gain.
3. Reviewers need to be aware that the authors deserve full credit for their effort and that the review process should be objective. No criticism of the author on a personal level is permitted.
4. Reviewers shouldn't examine manuscripts when they have affiliations or connections with any of the authors, businesses, or organisations associated with the papers that put them in a conflict of interest.
5. Reviewers should promptly produce a thorough and detailed peer review report. Any delays should be informed well in advance to the handling editor.
6. Any significant resemblance or overlap between the paper under consideration and any other published work of which the reviewers have first-hand knowledge should be brought to the editorial committee's notice.
7. After reading the given manuscript, reviewers should decide whether or not the paper falls within the journal's stated scope. To enable quick completion of the review process, they should assess the paper within the timeframe given. private comments to be made, with the reviewer giving the editor feedback on acceptance, rejection, or change. Never should a person's race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, language, place of origin, gender, or affiliation with any political organisation affect their opinions or reviews.